Sip Safe

Drink Safety App For Young Adults

PROJECT OVERVIEW


Social drinking is a major aspect of the college experience among young adults; the potential dangers of alcohol consumption is a blind spot for many adolescents. Alcohol safety is heavily neglected among college students struggling to understand the responsibility to engage in these activities. 



Binge Drinking

A pattern of drinking alcohol that blood alcohol concentration to 0.08%. For the average adult, this pattern corresponds to consuming 5 or more drinks(male), or four or more drinks(female) in less than 2 hours. Over 50% of college students participate in binge drinking; engaging in binge drinking can result in a myriad of life-changing consequences.


According to the World Health Organization & NIAA (2021), every year approximately ___ are caused by alcohol consumption:



  • 559,000 injuries

  • 696,000 assaults

  • 210,000 hospitalizations

  • 178,000 alcohol related deaths

Young adults struggle to identify safety precautions and risk situations in settings encouraging alcohol consumption. A research gap in lack of agency in preventing alcohol related harms including drink spiking and alcohol poisoning.


The Problem Space


We aim to understand how young adults perceive risk associated social drinking, and how these perceptions influence social behavior to develop a relevant solution addressing issues of alcohol safety among college students.

Goal


Timeline:

3 months



Role:

UX Designer and User Researcher


Team:

Project team including 4 User Researchers,

2 Designers, and UX Design Consultant



Skills & Tools:

Figma, Figjam, User Research, Visual Design



User Interviews

Previous research on alcohol consumption among young adults focused on the negative effects and harms of social drinking. Our research group wanted to understand the "why" behind our user's decisions and ideal mental model for a safer experience:

Main Topics


1. What are major risks participants associated with drinking?

2. What factors are affecting participants' behavior before/after engaging in social drinking?

3. What strategies do participants' use to prevent alcohol-related risks?

We initially conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with our main stakeholders: undergraduate and graduate students at Cornell University who engage in social drinking. We wanted to engage with participants about their past experiences and perceived risks with social drinking.

We started out by conducting contextual interviews to gain a baseline understanding of college students perspectives on social drinking, and affinity mapped our data to draw insights.

User Research

To conduct our user research, we relied on multiple user centered design methodologies to understand how young adults perceive risk associated with social drinking, and how these perceptions influence their social behavior:


1

User Interviews

Conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with our primary study group

2

Ethnographic Study

Our qualitative research method for engaging & observing user experiences in social drinking settings

3

Co-Design

Our user-centered design method where users collaborate with designers in the design process by generating, identifying, and critiquing design ideas

What Did We Find?

  • Participating in social drinking have at least 2-4 drinks with preference for intimate small gatherings than large public settings

  • Reported positive and negative peer pressure influences especially in popular settings

  • Identified both tech & non-tech safety strategies for safe experiences in public

Ethnographic Study



This method aligned with our project goals because it allowed us to observe and understand the dynamics of social drinking and safety concerns within their natural setting. As such, our ethnographic study generated two main types of data about our user group:

Observational Field Notes

Handwritten/typed detailed field notes were taken including descriptions of the setting, activities, conversations, non-verbal cues, and researchers' reflections.


Each team member recorded notes on both the drinking habits and social behavior.

Short Contextual Interviews

Our research group was split into 2 pairs (one interviewer and one notetaker in each pair) to approach our participants

We approached potential participants, briefly explained the study, and asked for their consent for the study. We took careful note to only interview participants who were not inebriated.

A

B

C

Contextual Observations

Short Interviews

What Did We Learn?

On average, 3-5 drinks consumed on a night out (higher than self-reports)


Felt secure with friends, anxious in unfamiliar or mostly male groups

Safety perceptions influenced by environment, alcohol, and others

Wide adoption of PBS strategies (staying in groups, moderating intake, Uber/ carpool)

Used technology for safety (sharing locations, texting friends)

According to participants, proximity = safety (to friends & to drinks)

40+

10

Observed people in our site locations

Diverse participants for on-site interviews

Our Major Takeaway: Experienced young adults develop protective behavioral strategies to avoid harms and protect their peers from bad actors

Using Ride Share Apps

Participants always cited Uber & Lyft as safe transportation rather than driving

Texting Friends

Emphasized the importance of giving updates to their friends on their plans

Live Chatting

Some participants recalled doing video calls or FaceTime's to check in with their peers

Sharing Locations

Female participants noted sharing their GPS location with their roommates when going out drinking or partying

Our user group actively uses technology as solutions for protective behavioral strategies through four major methods:

An affinity map to find common trends between observed social groups

Protective Behavioral Strategies

Individual harm reduction approaches which aim to reduce alcohol-related consequences. Primarily identified as proactive self-control, drinking control, and alcohol reduction strategies.


According to the National Institutes of Health (2014), most PBS approaches can be classified in two categories:



Alcohol Intake



Bodily Safety



  • Setting Drink Limits

  • Alternating non-alcoholic beverages & alcoholic beverages

  • Avoid drinking in short durations

  • Designated drivers

  • Using public transportation

  • Avoid drinking unknown substances

  • Drinking with a sober companion

Our co-design session focused on our target audience in developing solutions for improving safety in social drinking environments. As such, our user group was Cornell University students (between the ages of 21-23 yrs old).


These sessions complemented our initial ethnographic study, where our field observations provided valuable insights into existing behaviors and translate those observations into user-centered design concepts.







Co-Design

All positive experiences revolved around friends and community in familiar settings

Most negative experiences were in off-campus bars or frat parties

Uncovered more insights regarding implicit biases for identifying danger signals

(i.e drinking with women versus drinking with men affecting social behavior)

Our participants engaged in facilitated discussion to share positive & negative experiences with social drinking

How Might We centered on lived-in experiences with PBS while social drinking:

"HMW stay in close contact with friends?"

"HMW get immediate help when finding a missing person?" etc.

Implemented brainstorming methods such as Crazy 8s to encourage outside-of-the box design thinking for unique solutions

Evaluated our proposed solutions through group critique to find the perfect niche for the design solution

Using the How Might We framework, participants brainstormed solutions based on their experiences and the identified factors

Both tech and non-tech solutions were presented suggesting a need for solutions in both spaces

Further iterations on our design sketches worked within current technical limitations and constraints for a holistic solution

We conducted group critique to discuss our sketches from our brainstorming and highlighting key features and feasibility

What Is Sip Safe?

Our solution space offers an opportunity to intervene with a mobile app for interactive maps, group coordination, and emergency assistance to enable responsible drinking experiences. 

A mindfulness drinking app aimed to provide ways for users to stay safe and informed while out socially drinking both on and off campus.



#1: Incident Report Map

A map for drinking locations in your area. Discover new hangouts for your happy hour without the red flags. View recent safety incidents & risk levels at specific locations before hitting the streets!



Users can plan their drinking outings & avoid locations with high reports of risks such as drink spiking, sexual harassment, and other safety concerns. These reports would be anonymously gathered by users



#2: App Tracking With Your Friends

The Proximity Alert feature utilizes location tracking to keep users informed about the whereabouts of their friends in real time! Provides feedback based on proximity through camera flashes, vibrations, & text alerts

#3: Setting Drink Limits

To prevent overdrinking, users can set a limit for drinks for their session ahead of time. This feature allows users to plan their consumption while discouraging drinking beyond their limits while they are inebriated.



#4: Emergency Contact

A streamlined process to quickly reach out to emergency services, specifically 911, in times of need.

Users can swiftly seek assistance in emergencies without the need for additional steps.